<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Top Five Categories of FreeBSD Unmaintained Ports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sourcehosting.net/2009/06/12/top-ten-categories-freebsd-unmaintained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sourcehosting.net/2009/06/12/top-ten-categories-freebsd-unmaintained/</link>
	<description>Various ramblings on the subjects of SaaS, software development, source code control, configuration management and entrepreneurship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:15:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Larkin</title>
		<link>http://blog.sourcehosting.net/2009/06/12/top-ten-categories-freebsd-unmaintained/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Larkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sourcehosting.net/?p=109#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Hi Carsten,

Thanks very much for the question.  When I was putting this post together, my goal was to raise awareness of how many and how many different kinds of unmaintained ports there are.  Admittedly, I could have chosen some other ports for the sample column above, but most of the ones I listed have pending upstream package updates according to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://portscout.org/ports@freebsd.org.html&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;portscout&lt;/a&gt; page, e.g. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freshports.org/graphics/Coin/&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Coin&lt;/a&gt;.

The diffutils port is one of the exceptions in that, as you noted, the upstream package has not changed for years, so there&#039;s not necessarily any reason to adopt the FreeBSD port. I included it because it&#039;s well-known and might spark some interest in finding out what else is in the tree that does need updating.

Cheers,
Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Carsten,</p>
<p>Thanks very much for the question.  When I was putting this post together, my goal was to raise awareness of how many and how many different kinds of unmaintained ports there are.  Admittedly, I could have chosen some other ports for the sample column above, but most of the ones I listed have pending upstream package updates according to the <a href="http://portscout.org/ports@freebsd.org.html" target="_new" rel="nofollow">portscout</a> page, e.g. <a href="http://www.freshports.org/graphics/Coin/" target="_new" rel="nofollow">Coin</a>.</p>
<p>The diffutils port is one of the exceptions in that, as you noted, the upstream package has not changed for years, so there&#8217;s not necessarily any reason to adopt the FreeBSD port. I included it because it&#8217;s well-known and might spark some interest in finding out what else is in the tree that does need updating.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carsten</title>
		<link>http://blog.sourcehosting.net/2009/06/12/top-ten-categories-freebsd-unmaintained/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Carsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sourcehosting.net/?p=109#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg,

Now that the comment functionality is fixed, I can repeat what I wanted to write yesterday :-)

I was wondering why you make so much effort to find out which ports are &quot;orphaned&quot;. I mean for some of them, there isn&#039;t anything to maintain from a user&#039;s perspective, because they are rock-solid and have been used as is for years. Take the diffutils. I wouldn&#039;t want anyone to mess with the &quot;diff&quot; command. And I&#039;m sure that all the developers and sysadmins out there, who use it, are happy to leave it untouched, because it just works. In fact, the GNU diffutils haven&#039;t been touched by anyone for seven years! http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/diffutils/

Cheers
Carsten</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg,</p>
<p>Now that the comment functionality is fixed, I can repeat what I wanted to write yesterday <img src='http://blog.sourcehosting.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I was wondering why you make so much effort to find out which ports are &#8220;orphaned&#8221;. I mean for some of them, there isn&#8217;t anything to maintain from a user&#8217;s perspective, because they are rock-solid and have been used as is for years. Take the diffutils. I wouldn&#8217;t want anyone to mess with the &#8220;diff&#8221; command. And I&#8217;m sure that all the developers and sysadmins out there, who use it, are happy to leave it untouched, because it just works. In fact, the GNU diffutils haven&#8217;t been touched by anyone for seven years! <a href="http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/diffutils/" rel="nofollow">http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/diffutils/</a></p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Carsten</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
